Nothing about the recent controversy? Why am I not surprised. 24.176.3.104 02:56, April 12, 2018 (UTC)
^ They protected the page years ago so that basically no one can edit it except sysops, who don't really care about the controversy or are inactive. Rtivey (talk) 07:10, April 18, 2018 (UTC)
Actually, I DO care about the controversy. But I've also lived through the days of Busy Street and other troll websites to know that people will ransack this page if I unlock it. I'm not adding the controversy in yet because I'm still waiting to see what will happen to CA as a website (as in, shut down/renamed/etc.). I feel as though you're under the impression that I "work" under Michaud, but I can tell you that he has no love for myself, my former team, and this wiki, as is stated in the document. --Spike's Girl (talk) 15:40, April 18, 2018 (UTC)
Controversy[]
It's been almost 3 years. I know Channel Awesome hasn't shown signs of dying (I wonder how they did that), but shouldn't we add the Channel Awesome controversy and Michaud's actions that relate to that? His disgusting actions were especially noted on Channel Awesome's Wikipedia page so they oughta be noted on this page as well.TheGreenBeetle (talk) 06:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Still not sure why I have no response to this. I believe that the Channel Awesome controversy should be added, but why hasn't it?TheGreenBeetle (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)