Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Row 3 info = [[The Jungle Book (2016)]]
 
|Row 3 info = [[The Jungle Book (2016)]]
 
|Row 4 title = Next review
 
|Row 4 title = Next review
|Row 4 info = [[Woody Woodpecker (2017)]]
+
|Row 4 info = [[Woody Woodpecker (2018)]]
 
|Row 5 title = Link
 
|Row 5 title = Link
 
|Row 5 info = http://channelawesome.com/beauty-and-the-beast-2017-nostalgia-critic/
 
|Row 5 info = http://channelawesome.com/beauty-and-the-beast-2017-nostalgia-critic/
}}''(The Channel Awesome logo is shown, before we fade to Belle, played by [[Tamara Chambers]], in a ballroom. As the music for "Beauty and the Beast" plays, Belle smiles at her dance partner, which is a large "$" sign, and starts dancing with it)''
+
}}''(The Channel Awesome logo is shown, before we fade to Belle, played by [[Tamara Chambers]], in a ballroom. As the music for "Beauty and the Beast" plays, Belle smiles at her dance partner, which is a large "$" sign, and starts dancing with it)''
   
 
'''Singer (Doug): Tale as old as time'''
 
'''Singer (Doug): Tale as old as time'''
Line 872: Line 872:
 
'''NC (vo): '''The original is a classic telling of a timeless story. This is just…a remake, [[When Should Remakes Not Happen?|a remake that doesn’t understand what made the original story so powerful]]. While it’s shorter and arguably simpler, every choice plays a part in driving the characters’ motivations. The emotions feel justified and earned. This one just changes things that don’t need to be changed, didn’t add enough to make it its own thing, and sped up parts that needed to remain slow. It’s as if the story is still there, but the wrong parts are focused on, leading to something that looks familiar, but feels false. If you enjoy it, more power to you, but I can tell you, this is a beast I don’t think I can ever learn to love.
 
'''NC (vo): '''The original is a classic telling of a timeless story. This is just…a remake, [[When Should Remakes Not Happen?|a remake that doesn’t understand what made the original story so powerful]]. While it’s shorter and arguably simpler, every choice plays a part in driving the characters’ motivations. The emotions feel justified and earned. This one just changes things that don’t need to be changed, didn’t add enough to make it its own thing, and sped up parts that needed to remain slow. It’s as if the story is still there, but the wrong parts are focused on, leading to something that looks familiar, but feels false. If you enjoy it, more power to you, but I can tell you, this is a beast I don’t think I can ever learn to love.
   
'''NC: '''Thank you for watching Disney's Live-Action Remake Month. And I gotta tell you, after seeing all of these animated classics turned into these live-action abominations, I got to see some cartoon that's put to live-action done right. ''(Woody Woodpecker's signature laugh is heard as NC looks aside in worry) ''[[Woody Woodpecker (2017)|That's not it]], is it...?
+
'''NC: '''Thank you for watching Disney's Live-Action Remake Month. And I gotta tell you, after seeing all of these animated classics turned into these live-action abominations, I got to see some cartoon that's put to live-action done right. ''(Woody Woodpecker's signature laugh is heard) ''That's not it, is it...?
   
 
''(The credits roll)''
 
''(The credits roll)''

Please note that all contributions to the Channel Awesome are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: